Monday, November 12, 2007

Does an Organic Diet Matter?


Question: I only buy organic foods for my family, even though it is more expensive. I’ve always assumed that this reduces my family’s exposure to pesticides, but recently read in the news that this isn’t true. Does it?

Response: Yes, with qualifications.

Organic foods are essentially free of pesticides, while nearly every type of conventional fruit and vegetable has at least one type of pesticide applied to it sometime from when the seeds are put into the ground to when they are sold. Logically then, eating organic foods rather than conventional foods will reduce your family’s exposure to pesticides.

The qualifications relate to the amount and importance of that reduced exposure.

The amount of the reduction in pesticide exposures will, of course, depend on what your family eats. The best scientific studies of pesticide exposures from foods suggest that an organic diet will basically eliminate one microgram of pesticides that would otherwise be eaten on a conventional diet in a typical day. [Putting this microgram into perspective is difficult, but for what it’s worth, a person eating 1,800 calories a day will typically eat 70 grams (or 70,000,000 micrograms) of fat, while a wasp sting delivers about 2 micrograms of venom. Of course, these comparisons say nothing about their dangers, as the toxicity of the pesticides differs tremendously from that of the fat and venom.]

The impact of switching to an organic diet is illustrated by a Seattle, Washington study, in which 23 children ate non-organic foods on the first three days and last seven days of the study. On the days in between, the children ate organic fruits and vegetables in addition to conventional meat and dairy products. During the first and third stages of the study, every one of the children had measurable amounts of pesticide metabolites (which are the less toxic break-down products of pesticides) in their urine. During the second organic fruit and vegetable stage, the amount of metabolites for two common pesticides chlorpyrifos and malathion was about ten times lower than the conventional diet periods.



Whether these lower levels translate into less health risks is not known, since pesticide metabolite levels during both the organic and non-organic diet periods were lower than US EPA limits. Also, these lower levels do not consider pesticide exposures that occur through the air, soil, indoor dust and water. Although its contribution varies by pesticide and by person, for the average person, food is only a minor contributor to exposures many common pesticides, including chlorpyrifos (used mostly on cotton, corn, almonds, and orange and apple fruit trees) and permethrin (used mostly on cotton, wheat, corn, alfalfa, and poultry). For example, in one scientific study, food accounted for only a few percent of total exposure to chlorpyrifos, while breathing indoor air contributed more than 80%. As a result, it is quite possible that a diet of organic foods will have only a modest effect on total exposure to pesticides.

That said, a growing number of scientific studies have shown that exposures to even small amounts of pesticides are harmful, especially to young children – which I think provides a pretty persuasive reason for you to keep buying organic food. A steady organic food diet is a good and relatively easy way (costs notwithstanding) to lower your risks from pesticides.

2 comments:

marie@287reasons.com said...

What an excellent blog Prof. Helen. This post is important indeed. Peaches have the most pesticides. It is tough to get any 100% organic because pesticides persist in the soil, acid rain, the wind blows in from other pesticides, rocket fuel... But we have to start somewhere indeed.
We are producing a movie on the toxic body burden (Inconvenient Truth scale) being released Fall 2008. Please keep in touch with us. Our site is http://287reasons.com . Movie name is "287". And please comment at our blog too. We will put a link to you at our blog as well. Thanks for your important blog.

Luka said...

I totally agree. I'd say that organic food is far better for you!

However, if you are struggling with costs etc, then, I believe that one should grow their own fruit and vegetables at home.

It not only means you can produce cheap organic food, but you can sell you excess produce and you are helping getting large lorries off the road.

I have a site with information on growing your own, visit this link for information on growing your own, it is not complete yet but should be completed by around Easter: http://www.ecohelper.info/category/grow-your-own

By the way: This is a great blog for learning about everything ECO and more! CONGRATULATIONS!